2023考研英語閱讀金融技術(shù)公司

由雕龍文庫 分享時間：2024-03-19 05:47:30 收藏本文

　　Financial-technology firms

　　金融技術(shù)公司

　　Apps at the gate

　　應(yīng)用近在咫尺

　　Tech start-ups promise to transform finance, ifregulators will let them

　　如果監(jiān)管者允許，技術(shù)創(chuàng)業(yè)公司希望改變金融業(yè)

　　Aug 3rd 2023 |From the print edition

　　TWO millennia after the Temple was cleansed of money-changers, the Archbishop ofCanterbury, Justin Welby, plans to open his churches to moneylenders. This is nocapitulation in the struggle between God and Mammon. It is an effort to compete out ofexistence payday lenders that offer expensive loans by supporting not-for-profit creditunions.

　　在寺院與金錢交易撇清關(guān)系兩千年之后，坎特伯雷大主教Justin Welby計劃開放教堂給放貸者。這不是選擇上帝或者貪婪之間的妥協(xié)。這是通過支持非盈利信用合作社讓高利息貸款失去市場。

　　The archbishop is right that more competition is needed, but old-fashioned credit unionsare unlikely to be able to beat the slick systems and snappy service of online providers,like Wonga. A more effective way of pushing down rates would be lighter regulation toallow more lenders to flourish.

　　大主教是對的，確實(shí)需要加強(qiáng)競爭，而這些老古董銀行也不太可能被像Wonga之類的擁有更加靈活的系統(tǒng)和快速的服務(wù)的網(wǎng)上金融服務(wù)提供商擊敗。推低利率更有效的方法是放松監(jiān)管，允許更多放貸者進(jìn)入市場。

　　Digital communications have given birth to a new generation of finance companies . Money-transfer agents such as Xoom have drastically cut the time and costs formigrant workers to send money home. Peer-to-peer lenders are matching savers andborrowers, slashing fees and delivering a better deal to both. New foreign-exchange firmsare giving travellers access to the prices quoted on wholesale currency markets. Cardcompanies such as Square and iZettle let anyone from yoga teachers to plumbers acceptpayments by credit card. Firms such as M-Pesa have given millions of people in developingcountries access to mobile money.

　　線上交流已經(jīng)催生出了新一代的金融公司。像Xoom這種轉(zhuǎn)帳機(jī)構(gòu)大大減少了外國務(wù)工人員匯款回家的時間和費(fèi)用。點(diǎn)對點(diǎn)借貸配對債權(quán)人和借債人，降低費(fèi)用，給雙方最好的選擇。新的外匯公司讓旅行者以大型外匯市場的匯率兌換現(xiàn)金。諸如Square和iZettle這樣的信用卡公司讓從瑜伽老師到管道工的客戶都能使用信用卡消費(fèi)。M-Pesa這類公司已經(jīng)讓發(fā)展中國家數(shù)百萬的人民使用上了移動錢包。

　　Heavy regulation of financial companies means many firms stick to small niches to skirt theboundaries of banking regulations. Peer-to-peer lenders do not offer savers the security ofdeposit insurance or the convenience of guaranteed instant access to their cash. This limitstheir appeal. Other firms that take deposits such as Holvi, a Finnish start-up that offers groupaccounts, are not allowed to lend. Those that do lend, such as Wonga, cannot take deposits.

　　金融公司嚴(yán)格的監(jiān)管制度意味著許多公司許多堅持小利基的公司要繞過銀行監(jiān)管的局限。點(diǎn)對點(diǎn)借貸不提供給債權(quán)人存款保證或者直接取錢的便利。其他的公司像Holvi，一個位于芬蘭提供集體賬戶的初創(chuàng)公司，只提供存款，但不能借貸。而像Wonga這樣能借貸的公司則不能存款。

　　Creating a financial-tech company is arduous. Whereas it takes less than a day to register acompany in Britain, it takes months or years and can cost millions to get authorised as abank. The number of new banks started over the past decade can almost be counted onone hand. Even those that have started, such as Metro Bank or Aldermore, are penalised byregulation: rules on capital favour large and complex firms. In America the Dodd-Frank Actis an imposing barrier to all but the biggest firms. And regulation is closing in on someexisting firms. M-Pesa has struggled to grow much beyond Kenya, partly because authoritiesstand in its way. The market for remittances has been a hothouse for start-ups in Britain,partly because it was lightly regulated. Yet almost half the countrys money-transfer firmsmay be shut as banks close their accounts to comply with money-laundering rules.

　　創(chuàng)建一家金融科技公司很費(fèi)力。在英國一家普通公司可能不到一天就注冊完成了，而要是成立一家銀行則有可能經(jīng)歷長達(dá)數(shù)月甚至數(shù)年的審批，而且可能要花費(fèi)上數(shù)百萬的費(fèi)用。過去十年里成立的銀行數(shù)量一只手就能數(shù)過來。即使是成立了的銀行像Metro Bank和Aldermore，都被監(jiān)管部門處罰過。關(guān)于資本的規(guī)定更有利于大型公司。在美國，多德弗蘭克法案對所有非大型公司是一個障礙。對很多公司的監(jiān)管很嚴(yán)。M-Pesa努力在肯尼亞之外發(fā)展，部分原因就是政府出面阻礙其發(fā)展。在英國，匯款市場在初創(chuàng)公司中很火，部分原因就是其監(jiān)管相對較松。但是如果銀行以違反洗錢規(guī)則關(guān)閉它們的賬戶，那么近一半的轉(zhuǎn)帳公司將會關(guān)門大吉。

　　Banks need to be more heavily regulated than other firms because of their central role inthe economy. However, governments could regulate more smartly, raising capitalrequirements for big and systemically important banks while easing the burden on smallerones. Regulators should be even more relaxed about many of the new entrants to themarket, most of which simply provide quicker and simpler ways of shifting money around.Most of these start-ups avoid the alchemy of bankingthe transformation of short-termdeposits into long-term loansso pose little systemic risk.

　　銀行比其他公司的監(jiān)管更嚴(yán)厲，原因是它們在經(jīng)濟(jì)活動中至關(guān)重要。但是，政府能更聰明地管理銀行業(yè)。提高對大型系統(tǒng)性銀行的監(jiān)管，放松對小型銀行的管理。監(jiān)管人員應(yīng)該對新入行的公司放輕松，這些公司只是提供更方便快捷的轉(zhuǎn)賬方式。大多數(shù)初創(chuàng)公司避開銀行業(yè)的核心業(yè)務(wù)--將短期存款轉(zhuǎn)換成長期借貸--這樣系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險就很小了。

　　The idea of lighter-touch regulation will seem to many an anathema after the financialcrisis. It would certainly lead to more failures by small banks and start-ups. This would alsoimpose some costs on society and deposit-guarantee schemes. Yet these costs would beoutweighed by the enormous benefits to consumers and businesses of a far morecompetitive financial system.