雅思作文教育類話題，雅思考試中慎用范文，更不可照搬背誦。下面是雅思為大家整理的雅思作文題目范文，供大家參考。雅思預(yù)祝大家在雅思考試中取得好成績(jī)！

　　下面是另外一篇拙文, 即興寫(xiě)作,難免粗拙

　　2009年1月15日 重復(fù) 2009年4月25日

　　教育類考題: 在校學(xué)生從課堂獲得的知識(shí)量大于來(lái)自網(wǎng)絡(luò)和電視的知識(shí)量.

　　關(guān)鍵詞: 學(xué)校學(xué)習(xí) 和 網(wǎng)絡(luò)電視學(xué)習(xí)

　　Students at schools and universities learn far more from lessons with teachers than from others sources . To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　范文 250單詞

　　The statement that teachers outnumber other resources such as internet or television programs in terms of how much student can learn on campus is too presumptuous.

　　How much student can learn depends not only on the resources of knowledge or information but also on students themselves and the environment in which they learn. In some leading universities or schools, the academic staffs are usually outstanding leaders in their subjects, and the campus is well equipped with various facilities to help live and learn. In this case, it is often true that students in general are able to learn more from teachers than from other resources. This also explains why so many bright young people pay high tuitions to graduate or professional programs.

　　Certainly, not all teachers are qualified. In some hinterland or remote areas, educational staffs and facilities are rather scarce. Teachers are usually those who themselves are less well educated. In this case, to learn from these teachers is less effective or even negative. This accounts for why so many parents spend all of their money in renting a small room in the slums or ghettoes in Beijing, China close to universities to help children learn more and better.

　　These, however, should not be the absolute conclusion. The fact is that some students can learn well from both resources, while others fail in either.

　　In conclusion, I do not agree the argument that at schools students can learn much more from teachers than other resources. In fact, it depends.

　　雅思作文教育類話題，雅思考試中慎用范文，更不可照搬背誦。下面是雅思為大家整理的雅思作文題目范文，供大家參考。雅思預(yù)祝大家在雅思考試中取得好成績(jī)！

　　下面是另外一篇拙文, 即興寫(xiě)作,難免粗拙

　　2009年1月15日 重復(fù) 2009年4月25日

　　教育類考題: 在校學(xué)生從課堂獲得的知識(shí)量大于來(lái)自網(wǎng)絡(luò)和電視的知識(shí)量.

　　關(guān)鍵詞: 學(xué)校學(xué)習(xí) 和 網(wǎng)絡(luò)電視學(xué)習(xí)

　　Students at schools and universities learn far more from lessons with teachers than from others sources . To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　范文 250單詞

　　The statement that teachers outnumber other resources such as internet or television programs in terms of how much student can learn on campus is too presumptuous.

　　How much student can learn depends not only on the resources of knowledge or information but also on students themselves and the environment in which they learn. In some leading universities or schools, the academic staffs are usually outstanding leaders in their subjects, and the campus is well equipped with various facilities to help live and learn. In this case, it is often true that students in general are able to learn more from teachers than from other resources. This also explains why so many bright young people pay high tuitions to graduate or professional programs.

　　Certainly, not all teachers are qualified. In some hinterland or remote areas, educational staffs and facilities are rather scarce. Teachers are usually those who themselves are less well educated. In this case, to learn from these teachers is less effective or even negative. This accounts for why so many parents spend all of their money in renting a small room in the slums or ghettoes in Beijing, China close to universities to help children learn more and better.

　　These, however, should not be the absolute conclusion. The fact is that some students can learn well from both resources, while others fail in either.

　　In conclusion, I do not agree the argument that at schools students can learn much more from teachers than other resources. In fact, it depends.